(We use this principle when stemming a very wide chimney. Climbers can press at a steeper angle because they have rubber-soled shoes. See picture of Matador opposite).
This device would have limited use as climbing protection as it would only fit one size of crack - but the concept can be developed to fit a variety of crack widths by using several pairs of rods of different lengths - See Fig 3 to the left. If these rods are fanned out, a familiar shape emerges - that of a cam - see Fig.4 to the left. Designing the Perfect Cam. A cam, as used in engineering, is any roller with an asymmetrical shape. What the climber needs is a constant angle cam - a cam that always meets the side of the crack at the same angle. See Figure 5 below which illustrates this perfectly - in effect replicating the effect of changing the length of rods as shown in diagrams 3 and 4 - without channg the camming angle. So what is the perfect camming angle? To answer this question one needs to go back to the friction test. Aluminium slips on granite at 18° but if this angle were used the device would be at its absolute limit of friction in a parallel granite crack and would not work in a flared placement or in say, a limestone crack. The angle needs to be reduced a little. Ray Jardine originally used 15° on his prototype Friends, which was good on granite, the rock he was familiar with, but didn’t work as well in some rock types he climbed on in Britain in 1977. After much testing, Ray and Wild Country decided on 13.75°, an angle that worked well on most rock types and allowed for use in quite flared cracks in such rock as granite and gritstone. Wild Country has never needed to change this angle, which has become internationally acknowledged as the definitive camming angle. |